Renault Scenic 2006 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Scenic) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Almera Tino) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, but torque is 77 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.7 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera Tino can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Almera Tino version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic and Nissan Almera Tino are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 34 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |