Renault Scenic 2006 vs Volkswagen Touran 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Scenic) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen Touran) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 55 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 132 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 15 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 289 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |