Renault Scenic 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic 2009 engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Scenic 2013, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Renault Scenic 2013. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Renault Scenic 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic 2009 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic 2013, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Megane, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Scenic 2013 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic 2009 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic 2013 has more luggage space. Renault Scenic 2009 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic 2013. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic 2013 (by 33 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`983 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |