Renault Scenic 2009 vs Peugeot 1007 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Scenic and Peugeot 1007 have the same engine power, but Renault Scenic torque is 4 NM more than Peugeot 1007. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 3.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 51 cm longer than the Peugeot 1007, 16 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 154 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1192 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 283 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 1007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`877 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Peugeot 1007 has
| |