Renault Scenic 2009 vs Peugeot 1007 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 42 HP more power than Peugeot 1007, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Peugeot 1007. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 4.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 3.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 61 cm longer than the Peugeot 1007, 16 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 154 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1192 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 283 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 1007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`944 | 1`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Peugeot 1007 has
| |