Renault Scenic 2009 vs Opel Combo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Scenic is 2 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 16 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 18 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`944 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Opel Combo has
| |