Renault Scenic 2009 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 159 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 81 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine: The engine boasts a simple and reliable design. After 100,000 km, piston knocking is a common issue. Electromagnetic Ti-VCT valves often develop leaks, and high-voltage wires frequently disconnect. The engine ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 4 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 5 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`944 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |