Renault Scenic 2009 vs Fiat Doblo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Stilo, Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Doblo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 353 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`944 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Doblo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |