Renault Scenic 2012 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 45 HP less power than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`973 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Scenic scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Scenic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |