Renault Scenic 2012 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 69 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 225 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`904 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Touran, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |