Renault Scenic 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic and Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan have the same engine power, but Renault Scenic torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | 1520 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`967 kg | 1`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`460 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 507 kg | 410 kg | |
| Renault Scenic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Therefore, Renault Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |