Renault Scenic 2012 vs Renault Kangoo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Scenic is 15 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | 1977 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 32 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 107 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`967 kg | 1`982 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`460 kg | 1`505 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 507 kg | 477 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |