Renault Scenic 2012 vs Dacia Dokker 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Dacia Dokker. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Scenic and Dacia Dokker are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 330 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`967 | 1`899 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |