Renault Scenic 2012 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1460 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 30 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`967 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |