Renault Scenic 2016 vs Toyota Verso 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.7 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 160 HP | 112 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 160 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.2 seconds | 10.1 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.0 | 4.5 - 6.8 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Verso. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1740 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 88 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`071 | ~ 2`202 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |