Renault Scenic 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Scenic is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.7 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 160 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 380 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14.2 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 6.0 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 100 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`071 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |