Renault Scenic 2003 vs Renault Clio 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 163 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | 9.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 4.7 - 7.5 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 9 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Clio has
| |