Renault Scenic 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Scenic
2003 - 2006
Ford C-Max
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 80 - 163 HP90 - 145 HP
Torque: 127 - 340 NM145 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 - 15.7 seconds9.6 - 12.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0 - 8.64.9 - 8.3
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, a Renault Scenic with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford C-Max.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.34 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.62 m1.60 m
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher.
Renault Scenic is 8 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1840 litres1620 litres
Renault Scenic has 120 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 220 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`955~ 1`958
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 12001600
Rating in user reviews: 5.4/10 7.6/10
Pros and Cons: Renault Scenic has
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv