Renault Scenic 2003 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 163 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.6 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |