Renault Scenic 2006 vs Renault Megane 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 - 165 HP | 85 - 225 HP | |
Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 127 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 14.6 seconds | 6.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.6 | 4.5 - 8.8 | |
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.21 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.46 m | |
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1190 litres | |
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 76 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`959 | ~ 1`797 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Megane has
| |