Renault Scenic 2012 vs Opel Meriva 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Scenic
2012 - 2016
Opel Meriva
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel, lPG)

Performance

Power: 110 - 165 HP95 - 140 HP
Torque: 151 - 380 NM130 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 - 13.4 seconds9 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 8.14.0 - 7.2
Renault Scenic petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Meriva. On average, Renault Scenic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.37 m4.29 m
Width: 1.85 m1.88 m
Height: 1.64 m1.62 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 8 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1870 litres1500 litres
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity.
Renault Scenic has 70 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 370 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.06 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.06 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`995no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 60006400
Pros and Cons: Renault Scenic has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Opel Meriva has
  • petrol, diesel and LPG engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv