Renault Scenic 2012 vs Renault Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 165 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 - 380 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Scenic 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic 2009. On average, Renault Scenic 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic 2012 is 6 cm longer than the Renault Scenic 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic 2012 has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic 2012 has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic 2009. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic 2012 (by 33 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`995 | ~ 1`973 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |