Renault Modus 2005 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Renault Modus engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Renault Modus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Modus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Modus consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Renault Modus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Modus consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.79 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Modus is smaller, but higher. Renault Modus is 26 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Modus is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 274 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Modus is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Renault Modus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Modus has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |