Renault Modus 2008 vs Toyota Verso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Renault Modus engine produces 24 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Renault Modus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Modus consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Modus could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Modus consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Modus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.60 m | |
| Renault Modus is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 217 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1302 litres | 623 litres | |
| Renault Modus has 213 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 679 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Modus is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Renault Modus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Modus has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Modus has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |