Renault Modus 2008 vs Peugeot 1007 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Modus engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 1007, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Peugeot 1007. Due to the lower power, Renault Modus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Modus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Modus consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007, which means that by driving the Renault Modus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Modus consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Modus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Modus is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Modus is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 1007, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Modus is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 217 litres | 154 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1302 litres | 1192 litres | |
|
Renault Modus has more luggage capacity. Renault Modus has 63 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 1007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Modus is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`596 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Modus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Modus, so Renault Modus quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Modus has
|
Peugeot 1007 has
| |