Renault Modus 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Renault Modus is more dynamic to drive. Renault Modus engine produces 7 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, but torque is 55 NM less than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Renault Modus reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Modus consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Modus could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Modus consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Nemo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Modus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen Nemo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Renault Modus is smaller. Renault Modus is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen Nemo, 32 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Modus is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 217 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1302 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Nemo has more luggage space. Renault Modus has 143 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Modus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Renault Modus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Modus has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |