Renault Modus 2004 vs Renault Clio 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 - 113 HP | 60 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 105 - 240 NM | 93 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 15 seconds | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.5 | 4.3 - 7.9 | |
Renault Modus petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Renault Modus equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.79 m | 3.96 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.48 m | |
Renault Modus is 17 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Modus is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 274 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1283 litres | 1035 litres | |
Renault Modus has 14 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 248 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Modus is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Renault Modus can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`656 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Modus has
|
Renault Clio has
| |