Renault Koleos 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 15 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Renault Koleos is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Koleos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 305 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |