Renault Koleos 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 25 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Koleos and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |