Renault Koleos 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 9 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Renault Koleos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Renault Koleos and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 955 litres | |
| Renault Koleos has 106 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |