Renault Koleos 2008 vs Renault Captur 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 175 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 85 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 3.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.12 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.57 m | |
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 40 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 377 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1235 litres | |
Renault Koleos has more luggage capacity. Renault Koleos has 73 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 145 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 1`749 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Renault Captur has
| |