Renault Koleos 2008 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 43 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Renault Koleos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 5 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Renault Koleos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
BMW X3 has
| |