Renault Koleos 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 20 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Koleos consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Auris, Lexus IS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine: The Toyota 2AD-FHV (2.2 D-CAT) is a powerful diesel engine, but it is also known for a number of serious reliability concerns. While it delivers strong performance, ownership costs can rise significantly once the mileage reaches around 150,000–200,000 km. The most notorious weakness is failure of the ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Renault Koleos is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 127 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |