Renault Koleos 2011 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Renault Koleos is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Koleos is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 305 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |