Renault Koleos 2011 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Koleos consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Renault Koleos is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Koleos is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage capacity. Renault Koleos has 45 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |