Renault Koleos 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Renault Koleos and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Renault Koleos torque is 128 NM more than Honda CR-V. Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Renault Koleos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Honda Accord | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors. Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 524 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`080 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |