Renault Koleos 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 133 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 214 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.7 | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Renault Koleos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is smaller. Renault Koleos is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Koleos is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |