Renault Koleos 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 19 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 6 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 139 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Koleos is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |