Renault Koleos 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 31 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Renault Koleos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 15 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`973 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Koleos scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |