Renault Koleos 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 170 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Renault Koleos over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors. Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 139 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Koleos is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |