Renault Koleos 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 17 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1380 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`300 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`784 kg | 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 516 kg | 625 kg | |
| Renault Koleos load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |