Renault Koleos 2013 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 43 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 7 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 22 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |