Renault Koleos 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Renault Koleos has more luggage capacity. Renault Koleos has 66 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 161 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |