Renault Koleos 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 23 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 20 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Koleos consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 55 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`035 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |