Renault Koleos 2013 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Compass. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Koleos consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Koleos consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 8 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |