Renault Koleos 2020 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is smaller. Renault Koleos is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Koleos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 493 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 493 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1707 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 57 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`333 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`773 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 670 kg | |
| Renault Koleos load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |