Renault Koleos 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Renault Koleos engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Koleos consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Koleos consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 189 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Espace | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is smaller. Renault Koleos is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Koleos is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 498 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 498 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1706 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 52 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`309 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 539 kg | 670 kg | |
| Renault Koleos load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |