Renault Koleos 2018 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is more dynamic to drive. Renault Koleos engine produces 25 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Koleos) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Espace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 2 cm longer than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Koleos is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 20 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 77 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Renault Koleos can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
BMW X3 has
| |