Renault Koleos 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Renault Koleos engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Renault Koleos reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Koleos consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Koleos could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
| Renault Koleos has 6 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |