Renault Koleos 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 175 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 360 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.3 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.6 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Renault Koleos petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Renault Koleos equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Renault Koleos has 55 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`206 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |